The integrity and authority of ECDMA.org’s publications rest upon the expertise and diligence of our esteemed Review Board. This group of distinguished professionals is the cornerstone of our commitment to publishing content of the highest quality and accuracy. Every article and research paper featured in our “Insights” section undergoes a rigorous evaluation by our reviewers to ensure it meets the exacting standards outlined in our Editorial Policy.
Our Selection Criteria
Membership on the ECDMA.org Review Board is by invitation only. We identify and select individuals who are not just participants in their industry but are recognized leaders with a demonstrable record of exceptional accomplishment. Our criteria ensure that every reviewer possesses the deep subject matter expertise required to critically assess complex topics.
To be considered for our board, a candidate must be a leading professional with significant experience and outstanding achievements in their field. This includes, but is not limited to:
- Verifiable Leadership: Holding senior or executive roles in reputable technology, data, or digital commerce organizations.
- Recognized Expertise: A history of significant contributions to the industry, such as pioneering research, developing influential technologies, or leading landmark projects.
- Published Works: Authorship of influential papers in top-tier academic journals or respected industry publications.
- Industry Accolades: Receipt of prestigious awards, patents, or other formal recognitions for their contributions and innovations.
Commitment to Integrity
Our reviewers are entrusted with the critical responsibility of upholding our editorial standards. As detailed in our policies, each submission is evaluated by at least three board members to ensure a comprehensive and fair assessment.
To maintain impartiality, our review process is transparent and requires all reviewers to adhere to the strict conflict of interest rules outlined within our Editorial Policy. Any reviewer with a personal or professional connection to the author or the entities discussed in a submission must recuse themselves from the review process, guaranteeing an unbiased and objective evaluation for every piece we publish.